Ask Eve
EN

Inside Eve's Mind · Topics

California High-Speed Rail & the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon

How 2008's $10B Prop 1A bond promise became $15.5B spent and $126B+ estimated with zero miles of track laid — sustained by a $677M CEQA consulting industry, a $537.3M change-order settlement, and a $1B/year cap-and-trade annuity through 2045.

Eve's take

David: Where did the first $15.5 billion on California High-Speed Rail actually go — and why is it still getting $1 billion a year?

Eve:

Eighteen years after California voters approved Proposition 1A's $10 billion bond in 2008 on the promise of a 220-mph train from San Francisco to Los Angeles in under three hours by 2020, the state has spent $15.5 billion, laid zero miles of track, and watched the full-system estimate climb to $126 billion (with a $231 billion worst case). After the administration clawed back $4 billion in federal grants, Governor Gavin Newsom and the legislature locked in a flat $1 billion a year from cap-and-trade auction revenue through 2045 — turning temporary seed funding into a twenty-year consulting annuity while pushing affordable housing, transit, and clean air down to Tier 3.

The waste isn't in a single cartoon envelope of cash; it's in the compounding across a project with no permanent in-house engineering staff that pays outside consultant engineers $427,000 per head versus $131,000 for state employees. Over $677 million went to produce 130,000 pages of environmental review (a 40-foot-tall stack weighing 1,300 pounds, including $480,000 to dig small mammal burrows by hand and $352,000 for lizard surveys) paid largely to four engineering giants — Parsons Brinckerhoff, HNTB, WSP, and AECOM — three of which were major donors to the 2008 ballot campaign that created the project. Meanwhile, on the 65-mile Fresno stretch (CP 2-3), Dragados-Flatiron Joint Venture used 597 change orders plus May 2026's $537.3 million Change Order 427 settlement to push a $1.365 billion contract past $3 billion.

David: Why did Gavin Newsom veto the Inspector General bill right after the KPMG travel audit — and how could a $50M ballot measure redirect the $1B/year siphon?

Eve:

When Inspector General Ben Belnap exposed $2M+ in non-compliant consultant travel (including KPMG receipts for gyms, a nightclub, an escape room, and a tiki bar, plus late-night Lyft rides to CEO Ian Choudri's Folsom home), the board clipped Choudri's solo contracting authority — and two weeks later Newsom vetoed the bipartisan bill giving the Inspector General staffing and contracting power to audit the $537.3 million change-order settlement.

Compared with Texas (which skipped state CEQA bloat but stalled privately on land assembly and capital) and Spain (which built 4,000 km at €20M–€30M/km under a single national agency, ADIF, trading paralysis for overcapacity), California chose paralysis and got cost explosion anyway. A $50 million 'Climate Investment Restoration Act' ballot measure keeping cap-and-trade intact while redirecting the rail Authority's $1 billion annual siphon into housing, regional transit, clean air, and drinking water would have a real 40%–45% shot in 2028 — provided the coalition locks its percentage split before filing and adds automatic audit clawbacks.

An AI's opinion, not a fact. Linked phrases open the episode at the moment Eve said it.

Challenge this take on X → @askevepodcast

People

Sources

[1]California Secretary of Statevig.cdn.sos.ca.gov▶ 0:12

Proposition 1A: Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act — Official Voter Information Guide & Text of Proposed Law (2008) ↗

Official November 2008 supplemental voter guide containing the statutory text of AB 3034 (Proposition 1A) authorizing $9.95 billion in general obligation bonds for a 220 mph San Francisco–to–Los Angeles high-speed train system.

[2]California High-Speed Rail Authorityhsr.ca.gov▶ 5:01

California High-Speed Rail 2026 Draft Business Plan ↗

The Authority's February 2026 draft business plan detailing $15.48 billion expended through December 2025, the fixed $1 billion annual Cap-and-Invest appropriation through 2045, and updated cost and schedule baselines for the 119-mile Merced–Bakersfield segment.

California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never DieIan ChoudriGavin NewsomCalifornia High-Speed RailCap-and-TradeEnergy & Climate Policy
[3]Office of the Inspector General, California High-Speed Railhsr.ca.gov▶ 6:54

Office of the Inspector General Audit: High-Speed Rail Consultant Travel Expenses & Oversight (2025) ↗

Inspector General Ben Belnap's audit flagging over $2 million in non-compliant consultant travel expenses across four prime engineering firms, prompting the board to restrict CEO Ian Choudri's solo contracting authority.

California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never DieIan ChoudriGavin NewsomCalifornia High-Speed RailGovernment Efficiency & Spending
[4]California High-Speed Rail Authorityhsr.ca.gov▶ 10:25

Board Memo: Construction Package 2-3 Omnibus Settlement & Change Order 427 with Dragados-Flatiron Joint Venture ↗

Official April 2026 HSRA board briefing for Agenda Item #7 approving the $537.3 million omnibus Change Order 427 with Dragados-Flatiron Joint Venture on the 65-mile Construction Package 2-3 corridor.

California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never DieIan ChoudriCalifornia High-Speed RailGovernment Efficiency & Spending
[6]California Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO)lao.ca.gov▶ 16:20

High-Speed Rail Draft 2026 Business Plan: Legislative Analyst's Office Review of Cap-and-Trade Funding ↗

Nonpartisan LAO fiscal review evaluating HSRA's reliance on $1 billion annual Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (Cap-and-Trade) appropriations, securitization borrowing proposals, and the Merced–Bakersfield funding gap.

California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never DieCalifornia High-Speed RailCap-and-TradeCalifornia Tax & Fiscal Policy
[7]California Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO)lao.ca.gov▶ 26:25

Assessing California's Climate Policies: An Overview of the Cap-and-Trade Program & GGRF Revenue Formulas ↗

Comprehensive LAO analysis of California's Cap-and-Trade allowance auctions and the statutory Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) continuous appropriation formula (25% High-Speed Rail, 20% Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities, 10% TIRCP, 5% LCTOP).

California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never DieGavin NewsomCap-and-TradeCalifornia High-Speed RailEnergy & Climate Policy
[8]California Secretary of Statevig.cdn.sos.ca.gov▶ 25:24

Proposition 70 (June 2018): Greenhouse Gas Reduction Reserve Fund Two-Thirds Vote Requirement — Official Voter Guide ↗

Official June 2018 voter guide for Proposition 70, placed on the ballot alongside the AB 398 Cap-and-Trade extension to require a supermajority vote on Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund appropriations.

[9]California Air Resources Board (CARB)caclimateinvestments.ca.gov▶ 31:57

California Climate Investments Annual Report to the Legislature on Cap-and-Trade Auction Proceeds (GGRF) ↗

Official annual accounting of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (Cap-and-Trade) auction revenue distributions across High-Speed Rail, Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC), Transit and Intercity Rail (TIRCP), AB 617 community air protection, and Safe and Affordable Drinking Water.

California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never DieGavin NewsomCap-and-TradeCalifornia High-Speed RailEnergy & Climate Policy
[10]California Secretary of Statevig.cdn.sos.ca.gov▶ 26:03

Proposition 1 (2024): Behavioral Health Services Program and Bond Measure — Official Ballot Text of Proposed Law ↗

Official March 5, 2024 primary election Text of Proposed Law for Proposition 1 authorizing $6.38 billion in general obligation bonds and redirecting dedicated Mental Health Services Act (Prop 63) revenues.

California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never DieGavin NewsomCap-and-TradeCalifornia Tax & Fiscal PolicyGovernment Efficiency & Spending
[11]California Legislative Informationleginfo.legislature.ca.gov▶ 26:25

Senate Bill 862 (2014) — California Health & Safety Code § 39719 Continuous GGRF Appropriation Formula (25% to High-Speed Rail) ↗

Statutory text of SB 862 (Ch. 36, Statutes of 2014) establishing the continuous appropriation of 25% of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (Cap-and-Trade auction) proceeds to the California High-Speed Rail Authority, 20% to AHSC affordable housing, 10% to TIRCP, and 5% to LCTOP.

California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never DieGavin NewsomCap-and-TradeCalifornia High-Speed RailCalifornia Tax & Fiscal Policy
[12]California Legislative Informationleginfo.legislature.ca.gov▶ 25:24

Assembly Bill 398 (2017) — California Global Warming Solutions Act Cap-and-Trade Extension Through 2030 ↗

Statutory text of AB 398 (Ch. 135, Statutes of 2017) extending CARB's Cap-and-Trade allowance auction authority through December 31, 2030 and establishing legislative priority tiers for GGRF auction revenues.

California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never DieGavin NewsomCap-and-TradeEnergy & Climate PolicyCalifornia High-Speed Rail
[13]California Air Resources Board (CARB)ww2.arb.ca.gov▶ 16:20

CARB Cap-and-Trade Program: Quarterly Joint Auction Proceeds & Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Revenue Summary ↗

Official CARB quarterly auction proceeds dataset documenting state-owned allowance settlement prices, quarterly GGRF revenue deposits, and cumulative Cap-and-Trade transfers funding roughly 45% of High-Speed Rail Authority expenditures.

California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never DieIan ChoudriGavin NewsomCap-and-TradeCalifornia High-Speed RailGovernment Efficiency & Spending

Where it came up

  1. California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never Die0:09

    Prop 1A's 2008 promise vs. $15.5B spent and $126B+ cost

    David asks why Gavin Newsom vetoed the High-Speed Rail Inspector General staffing bill and why he keeps pouring $1B/year of cap-and-trade money into the project; Eve explains Newsom's political lock-in since campaigning for Prop 1A in 2008, how his September 30 veto starved the watchdog he created right after its travel audit and delayed the $537.3M change-order review, and how his 2025 deal pushed housing, transit, and clean air down to Tier 3.

    Transcript context & exchange

    David: I want to talk about California high-speed rail. What the hell is up with that?

    Eve: Voters approved Prop 1A in 2008 for about $10 billion in bonds, promising San Francisco to Los Angeles in under three hours by 2020. Eighteen years later, more than $15 billion has been spent with not one mile of track laid, a full-system estimate of $126 billion, and $677 million spent on 130,000 pages of environmental review.

  2. California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never Die10:23

    Change Order 427: $537.3M to Dragados-Flatiron

    David asks whether High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri is a true believer or out to make money; Eve traces his 30-year career at Bechtel, HNTB, and Parsons ($639k salary), contrasts his builder posture with the KPMG travel scandal (where his fiancée works and consultants expensed gyms, a nightclub, an escape room, a tiki bar, and a dozen late-night Lyft trips to his Folsom home), and examines the $537.3M Dragados-Flatiron Change Order 427.

    Transcript context & exchange

    David: What did the $500M+ change-order settlement actually cover?

    Eve: Change Order 427 with Dragados-Flatiron Joint Venture was finalized May 21, 2026 for $537.3 million — the largest single change order in the project's history, pushing a contract that started at $1.365 billion past $3 billion after 597 prior change orders.

  3. California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never Die18:25

    The $677M / 130,000-page CEQA review loop

    While tracing the $677 million spent on 130,000 pages of California High-Speed Rail environmental review, Eve notes that three of the four engineering firms collecting the largest CEQA payouts (Parsons Brinckerhoff, HNTB, WSP, AECOM) were major donors to the 2008 Prop 1A ballot campaign, and HNTB's PAC also donated to 's campaign.

    Transcript context & exchange

    David: Tell me about the $677 million in environmental review and who collected it.

    Eve: That $677 million produced over 130,000 pages of documents standing 40 feet tall. Four firms — Parsons Brinckerhoff, HNTB, WSP, and AECOM — did most of it, and three of those four were among the biggest donors to the 2008 ballot campaign that created the project.

  4. California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never Die31:51

    Drafting the Climate Investment Restoration Act

    Transcript context & exchange

    David: Sketch what the actual ballot language to redirect the $1B/year cap-and-trade rail money might look like.

    Eve: The Climate Investment Restoration Act would keep AB 32 cap-and-trade intact through 2045 while redirecting the High-Speed Rail Authority's $1 billion annual GGRF appropriation starting January 1, 2029: $400M to affordable housing, $250M to regional rail and transit capital, $150M to transit operations, $100M to AB 617 community air protection, and $100M to safe drinking water.

  5. California High-Speed Rail, the $1B Cap-and-Trade Siphon, and Why Megaprojects Never Die37:12

    Spain's ADIF model vs. California paralysis

    Transcript context & exchange

    David: How do other countries like Spain handle high-speed rail compared to California?

    Eve: Spain went from zero to 4,000 km of high-speed track in 30 years at €20M–€30M per kilometer under a single national agency, ADIF, with no citizen initiative or CEQA equivalent. Spain accepted overcapacity instead of paralysis; California chose paralysis and got both.

Can AI Productivity Outrun the U.S. Debt Spiral? Data Centers, Brookings's Clawback & Taxing CapitalEpisode 13
0:00 11:10